Comments for Bob on Medical Device Software

Comment on Agile development in a FDA regulated setting by zynga

zynga — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:00:16 +0000

i may not have figured this had been useful one or two years back nevertheless it is funny precisely how age changes the way you see contrasting concepts, thank you with regard to the write-up it’s good to browse through anything sensible now and then instead of the widely seen trash mascarading as blogs on the net, i’m going to enjoy a couple of rounds of facebook poker, take care

Comment on HIPAA and EMR Design by EMR Medical

EMR Medical — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:14:06 +0000

Thanks for sharing this information and article post.

Comment on Cloud Computing Design Patterns by Tanner Tumminia

Tanner Tumminia — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:28:03 +0000

Good Site on Cloud Computing and SaaS – We are periodically looking for good blog information
related to SaaS. Will be back to review more information on your blog.

Keep up the great work!

Thanks

Comment on Moving Mountains With the Brain by Personal EEG-based Communications Device | Bob on Medical Device Software

Personal EEG-based Communications Device | Bob on Medical Device Software — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:04:43 +0000

[...] usually skeptical off “mind reading” device claims (e.g. here), but P300-based technology has many years of solid research behind it. It may be pricey ($12,250) [...]

Comment on Guest Article: Static Analysis in Medical Device Software (Part 1) — The Traps of C by Guest Article: Static Analysis in Medical Device Software (Part 3) — Formal specifications | Bob on Medical Device Software

Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:56:25 +0000

[...] Cuoq at Frama-C continues his discussion of static analysis for medical device software. Also see Part 1 and Part [...]

Comment on Why Healthcare IT is Not a Game Changer by Ajithkumar CC

Ajithkumar CC — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:48:47 +0000

I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.
Thanks
Ajithkumar

Comment on Selecting a MVC/MVP Implementation for a Winforms Project by Magerquark.de » Blog Archiv » Some Windows Forms MVC/MVP resources

Magerquark.de » Blog Archiv » Some Windows Forms MVC/MVP resources — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:32:19 +0000

[...] “Selecting a MVC/MVP Implementation for a Winforms Project” – Weblog posting about MVC. [...]

Comment on Software Verification vs. Validation by Van

Van — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:34:30 +0000

Remember the Phrase: “The END justifies the MEAN” ? It was meant to say, as long as you can achieve the END result, you can do whatever you want. In QA, specifically V&V, we are saying to pass Quality Assurance, “The right END must be achieved through the right MEAN”

In the context of QA, you don’t want just to assert you have arrived at the END result, you also want to ensure the WAY you achieve it complies with specific standards, rules, the right ingredients set forth.

All definitions on Verification/Validation do not have anything wrong. They just keep listing the objects that would goes behind these two verbs, such as some artifacts, without stressing the fact that the artifacts goes behind Verification is associated with the method/way/ingredients, whereas the artifacts goes behind the verb Validate is associated with the end product that is produced by the method/way/ingredients!

They just do not delivery the intended IMPACT for understanding like this: “You VALIDATE the END, and you VERIFY the MEAN”

Comment on Plunging into Web Development by Carroll B. Merriman

Carroll B. Merriman — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:34:13 +0000

Thanks for this blog. I am new at development and this is a big help.

Comment on Plunging into Web Development by Cindy

Cindy — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:41:26 +0000

Thank you so much, I have been searching for an article on this for weeks! It’s amazing how information and technology can get the best of us sometimes!