<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bob on Medical Device Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog</link>
	<description>Software Development and Biomedical Engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:56:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Guest Article: Static Analysis in Medical Device Software (Part 1) &#8212; The Traps of C by Guest Article: Static Analysis in Medical Device Software (Part 3) — Formal specifications &#124; Bob on Medical Device Software</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2009/05/15/guest-article-static-analysis-in-medical-device-software-part-1-the-traps-of-c/comment-page-1/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest Article: Static Analysis in Medical Device Software (Part 3) — Formal specifications &#124; Bob on Medical Device Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=267#comment-2637</guid>
		<description>[...] Cuoq at Frama-C continues his discussion of static analysis for medical device software. Also see Part 1 and Part [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cuoq at Frama-C continues his discussion of static analysis for medical device software. Also see Part 1 and Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Healthcare IT is Not a Game Changer by Ajithkumar CC</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2010/02/15/why-healthcare-it-is-not-a-game-changer/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajithkumar CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=360#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.
Thanks
Ajithkumar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.<br />
Thanks<br />
Ajithkumar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Selecting a MVC/MVP Implementation for a Winforms Project by Magerquark.de &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Some Windows Forms MVC/MVP resources</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2008/02/01/selecting-a-mvcmvp-implementation-for-a-winforms-project/comment-page-1/#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator>Magerquark.de &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Some Windows Forms MVC/MVP resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2008/02/01/selecting-a-mvcmvp-implementation-for-a-winforms-project/#comment-2634</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Selecting a MVC/MVP Implementation for a Winforms Project&#8221; &#8211; Weblog posting about MVC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Selecting a MVC/MVP Implementation for a Winforms Project&#8221; &#8211; Weblog posting about MVC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Verification vs. Validation by Van</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2009/03/26/software-verification-vs-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=257#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Remember the Phrase: &quot;The END justifies the MEAN&quot; ?  It was meant to say, as long as you can achieve the END result, you can do whatever you want.  In QA, specifically V&amp;V, we are saying to pass Quality Assurance, &quot;The right END must be achieved through the right MEAN&quot;

In the context of QA, you don&#039;t want just to assert you have arrived at the END result, you also want to ensure the WAY you achieve it complies with specific standards, rules, the right ingredients set forth.

All definitions on Verification/Validation do not have anything wrong.  They just keep listing the objects that would goes behind these two verbs, such as some artifacts, without stressing the fact that the artifacts goes behind Verification is associated with the method/way/ingredients, whereas the artifacts goes behind the verb Validate is associated with the end product that is produced by the method/way/ingredients!

They just do not delivery the intended IMPACT for understanding like this:  &quot;You VALIDATE the END, and you VERIFY the MEAN&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the Phrase: &#8220;The END justifies the MEAN&#8221; ?  It was meant to say, as long as you can achieve the END result, you can do whatever you want.  In QA, specifically V&amp;V, we are saying to pass Quality Assurance, &#8220;The right END must be achieved through the right MEAN&#8221;</p>
<p>In the context of QA, you don&#8217;t want just to assert you have arrived at the END result, you also want to ensure the WAY you achieve it complies with specific standards, rules, the right ingredients set forth.</p>
<p>All definitions on Verification/Validation do not have anything wrong.  They just keep listing the objects that would goes behind these two verbs, such as some artifacts, without stressing the fact that the artifacts goes behind Verification is associated with the method/way/ingredients, whereas the artifacts goes behind the verb Validate is associated with the end product that is produced by the method/way/ingredients!</p>
<p>They just do not delivery the intended IMPACT for understanding like this:  &#8220;You VALIDATE the END, and you VERIFY the MEAN&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plunging into Web Development by Carroll B. Merriman</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2009/06/07/plunging-into-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Carroll B. Merriman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=271#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this blog. I am new at development and this is a big help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this blog. I am new at development and this is a big help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plunging into Web Development by Cindy</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2009/06/07/plunging-into-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=271#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much, I have been searching for an article on this for weeks! It&#039;s amazing how information and technology can get the best of us sometimes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much, I have been searching for an article on this for weeks! It&#8217;s amazing how information and technology can get the best of us sometimes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contradictory Observations and Electronic Medical Records by Steve Parker</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2009/03/03/contradictory-observations-and-electronic-medical-records/comment-page-1/#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=250#comment-2602</guid>
		<description>I am also agreeing with Andy that EMR is a good innovation in medical field its very useful and easy to access. I also search &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emrworkforce.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;inexpensive EMR&lt;/a&gt; services providers on net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also agreeing with Andy that EMR is a good innovation in medical field its very useful and easy to access. I also search <a href="http://www.emrworkforce.com/" rel="nofollow">inexpensive EMR</a> services providers on net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Verification vs. Validation by Tom</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2009/03/26/software-verification-vs-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=257#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve worked at a med device company as well and their quality system differentiates between the two.  However, in practice, when you hear the term V&amp;V it almost ALWAYS means verification.  Using the common definitions of the terms, validation should have been performed WAY before the first software drop to T&amp;E - and T&amp;E are generally NOT the right people to evaluate usefulness to the end user.  They are not system analysts and typically have no contact with the users.  Honestly, if you&#039;ve already built your system before you realize the system requirements don&#039;t meet the real user needs...well, someone should lose their job.  There is no reason to wait until the System Testing phase to make that determination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve worked at a med device company as well and their quality system differentiates between the two.  However, in practice, when you hear the term V&amp;V it almost ALWAYS means verification.  Using the common definitions of the terms, validation should have been performed WAY before the first software drop to T&amp;E &#8211; and T&amp;E are generally NOT the right people to evaluate usefulness to the end user.  They are not system analysts and typically have no contact with the users.  Honestly, if you&#8217;ve already built your system before you realize the system requirements don&#8217;t meet the real user needs&#8230;well, someone should lose their job.  There is no reason to wait until the System Testing phase to make that determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The EMR-Medical Devices Mess by Why Healthcare IT is Not a Game Changer &#124; Bob on Medical Device Software</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2007/09/22/the-emr-medical-devices-mess/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Healthcare IT is Not a Game Changer &#124; Bob on Medical Device Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2007/09/22/the-emr-medical-devices-mess/#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>[...] talked about HIT problems before, e.g. Healthcare Un-Interoperability and  The EMR-Medical Devices Mess. With all of the ARRA/HITECH talk along with the National Healthcare debate raging it made me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talked about HIT problems before, e.g. Healthcare Un-Interoperability and  The EMR-Medical Devices Mess. With all of the ARRA/HITECH talk along with the National Healthcare debate raging it made me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on the Zeo Personal Sleep Coach by Juan Huseth</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2010/01/17/more-on-the-zeo-personal-sleep-coach/comment-page-1/#comment-2564</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Huseth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=351#comment-2564</guid>
		<description>Hey, I loved the post.  I recently celebrated 5 years of using a device at night and I am still very content with the results.  My wife is happier than ever as well.  Plus, I&#039;m sure the machines are getting better as time goes on.  Anyway, keep up the terrific work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I loved the post.  I recently celebrated 5 years of using a device at night and I am still very content with the results.  My wife is happier than ever as well.  Plus, I&#8217;m sure the machines are getting better as time goes on.  Anyway, keep up the terrific work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
