<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Programming Languages for the New Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2008/12/26/programming-languages-for-the-new-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2008/12/26/programming-languages-for-the-new-year/</link>
	<description>Software Development and Biomedical Engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:44:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Farina</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2008/12/26/programming-languages-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Farina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>Consider Python. You can &#039;get things done&#039; (thanks to great documentation and libraries) and write in a functional style if you feel so inclined (I wouldn&#039;t call it a functional language, but it&#039;s not incomparable to Squeak or Clojure on your list, both which allow easy state modification).

I do this all the time in Python, generally eschewing stateful objects for what would be more accurately described as composite values.

I see that you don&#039;t have it on your list of categories already, so that&#039;d be a good place to go, even if it is more &#039;mainstream.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider Python. You can &#8216;get things done&#8217; (thanks to great documentation and libraries) and write in a functional style if you feel so inclined (I wouldn&#8217;t call it a functional language, but it&#8217;s not incomparable to Squeak or Clojure on your list, both which allow easy state modification).</p>
<p>I do this all the time in Python, generally eschewing stateful objects for what would be more accurately described as composite values.</p>
<p>I see that you don&#8217;t have it on your list of categories already, so that&#8217;d be a good place to go, even if it is more &#8216;mainstream.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gee</title>
		<link>http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/2008/12/26/programming-languages-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rdn-consulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got  client developing server apps using ERLANG. Their core capability is messaging so the built in resources of ERLANG fit the bill nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got  client developing server apps using ERLANG. Their core capability is messaging so the built in resources of ERLANG fit the bill nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

